<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 5 Rules for Naming Your Infusionsoft Tags	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/</link>
	<description>Enhance Your Business with CRM and Automation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:47:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brett Farr		</title>
		<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-735</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Farr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 21:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blickdigital.com/?p=636#comment-735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-728&quot;&gt;Sajith&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you Sajith - appreciate you reading!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-728">Sajith</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you Sajith &#8211; appreciate you reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sajith		</title>
		<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sajith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blickdigital.com/?p=636#comment-728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great job, Brett! 

Thank you so much for publishing this great article about InfusionSoft tagging convention. 

Appreciate your great work! 

Sajith]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job, Brett! </p>
<p>Thank you so much for publishing this great article about InfusionSoft tagging convention. </p>
<p>Appreciate your great work! </p>
<p>Sajith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brett Farr		</title>
		<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-607</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brett Farr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 14:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blickdigital.com/?p=636#comment-607</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-605&quot;&gt;2stallions digital marketing agency&lt;/a&gt;.

Very cool. Thank you for checking out the blog and for sharing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-605">2stallions digital marketing agency</a>.</p>
<p>Very cool. Thank you for checking out the blog and for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 2stallions digital marketing agency		</title>
		<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-605</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[2stallions digital marketing agency]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 02:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blickdigital.com/?p=636#comment-605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you for publishing this awesome article. I&#039;m a 
long time reader but I&#039;ve never been compelled to leave a comment.

I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Facebook.
Thanks again for a great post!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for publishing this awesome article. I&#8217;m a<br />
long time reader but I&#8217;ve never been compelled to leave a comment.</p>
<p>I subscribed to your blog and shared this on my Facebook.<br />
Thanks again for a great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Farr Brett		</title>
		<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-308</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farr Brett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blickdigital.com/?p=636#comment-308</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-307&quot;&gt;Matthew Burt&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for reading Matthew. I agree that tagging is subjective and for a long time I was against the rigidity of tagging structures, but I&#039;ve since converted and now rely on this structure as a starting point for my clients (and the team that works with me) to follow. Not every business is the same and so the tagging structure will need to change.

Couldn&#039;t agree with you more though, use something like this as a starting point and as you said, &#039;Do what makes sense to you&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-307">Matthew Burt</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading Matthew. I agree that tagging is subjective and for a long time I was against the rigidity of tagging structures, but I&#8217;ve since converted and now rely on this structure as a starting point for my clients (and the team that works with me) to follow. Not every business is the same and so the tagging structure will need to change.</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree with you more though, use something like this as a starting point and as you said, &#8216;Do what makes sense to you&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthew Burt		</title>
		<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-307</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Burt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 16:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blickdigital.com/?p=636#comment-307</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-200&quot;&gt;Judith Baker&lt;/a&gt;.

I would argue that there is no need to put the number first. It&#039;s all preference but the way I would create this particular setup would be to place the Company Name first (usually abbreviated) then the number that coincides with each category then the category name.

ex. Company A -&#062; 01. Profile
ex. Company B -&#062; 01. Profile

This will keep all categories/tags of one company together in a list but still be in order of numbered categories.

Sub categories could be handled numerous ways based on how you want to view your information. (be very cautious of having too many sub tags. Try to make the tag name describe itself as best it can without having a ton of subs.)

ex. &quot;Company A -&#062; 01. Profile&quot; is category and tag is &quot;01. Type - Prospect: 01 Unqualified&quot;
ex. &quot;Company B -&#062; 01. Profile&quot; is category and tag is &quot;01. Type - Prospect: 02 Qualified&quot;
ex. &quot;Company C -&#062; 01. Profile&quot; is category and tag is &quot;01. Type - Customer: 02 Promoter&quot; 

So Company C tag would look like this when searching for it: &quot;Company C -&#062; 01. Profile -&#062; 01. Type - Customer: 01 Promoter&quot;

Now... I would argue that this could be shortened to &quot;Company C -&#062; 01. Profile -&#062; 02. Customer: 01 Promoter&quot; if you don&#039;t need a ton of stuff under Profile (with 01. Prospect being before it)

Again I just want to point out that at some point this becomes worthless because you will end up sifting through 100s of tags when trying to find the one you want, due to multiple tags being named exactly the same with 2 or 3 companies so the less sub categories and the more descriptive each tag is the better. IMHO YMMV

Having said all of this, tagging is VERY subjective. Do what makes sense to you and allows your brain to find things the easiest. The only time you need 100% rigidity is if you work as a team in Infusionsoft so that anyone at any time can find the tag/contact/etc they need.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-200">Judith Baker</a>.</p>
<p>I would argue that there is no need to put the number first. It&#8217;s all preference but the way I would create this particular setup would be to place the Company Name first (usually abbreviated) then the number that coincides with each category then the category name.</p>
<p>ex. Company A -&gt; 01. Profile<br />
ex. Company B -&gt; 01. Profile</p>
<p>This will keep all categories/tags of one company together in a list but still be in order of numbered categories.</p>
<p>Sub categories could be handled numerous ways based on how you want to view your information. (be very cautious of having too many sub tags. Try to make the tag name describe itself as best it can without having a ton of subs.)</p>
<p>ex. &#8220;Company A -&gt; 01. Profile&#8221; is category and tag is &#8220;01. Type &#8211; Prospect: 01 Unqualified&#8221;<br />
ex. &#8220;Company B -&gt; 01. Profile&#8221; is category and tag is &#8220;01. Type &#8211; Prospect: 02 Qualified&#8221;<br />
ex. &#8220;Company C -&gt; 01. Profile&#8221; is category and tag is &#8220;01. Type &#8211; Customer: 02 Promoter&#8221; </p>
<p>So Company C tag would look like this when searching for it: &#8220;Company C -&gt; 01. Profile -&gt; 01. Type &#8211; Customer: 01 Promoter&#8221;</p>
<p>Now&#8230; I would argue that this could be shortened to &#8220;Company C -&gt; 01. Profile -&gt; 02. Customer: 01 Promoter&#8221; if you don&#8217;t need a ton of stuff under Profile (with 01. Prospect being before it)</p>
<p>Again I just want to point out that at some point this becomes worthless because you will end up sifting through 100s of tags when trying to find the one you want, due to multiple tags being named exactly the same with 2 or 3 companies so the less sub categories and the more descriptive each tag is the better. IMHO YMMV</p>
<p>Having said all of this, tagging is VERY subjective. Do what makes sense to you and allows your brain to find things the easiest. The only time you need 100% rigidity is if you work as a team in Infusionsoft so that anyone at any time can find the tag/contact/etc they need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Judith Baker		</title>
		<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judith Baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 17:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blickdigital.com/?p=636#comment-203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks... When something is new and it takes some time of actually using it to see the pitfalls,   I didn&#039;t want to get three months down the road with having set it up wrong as it would be a mess! 

So  to recap:
We give each company a unique category number, company name, category name AND THEN we also start the tag with the company name (unless there is a date that goes first. )

The subcategories are  will also have unique numbers, company name and subcategory.  

So now I have to make a spreadsheet to keep it all straight. 

Thank you again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230; When something is new and it takes some time of actually using it to see the pitfalls,   I didn&#8217;t want to get three months down the road with having set it up wrong as it would be a mess! </p>
<p>So  to recap:<br />
We give each company a unique category number, company name, category name AND THEN we also start the tag with the company name (unless there is a date that goes first. )</p>
<p>The subcategories are  will also have unique numbers, company name and subcategory.  </p>
<p>So now I have to make a spreadsheet to keep it all straight. </p>
<p>Thank you again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Farr Brett		</title>
		<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farr Brett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 03:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blickdigital.com/?p=636#comment-202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-201&quot;&gt;Judith Baker&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Judith - yes, that&#039;s exactly right. You&#039;ve answered all your own questions!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-201">Judith Baker</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Judith &#8211; yes, that&#8217;s exactly right. You&#8217;ve answered all your own questions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Judith Baker		</title>
		<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-201</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judith Baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blickdigital.com/?p=636#comment-201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[02. Question:) Do you give sub-numbers to sub-categories?  Will Infusionsoft recognize a sub-category number(and would you use a period between numbers so they will pull it up in order). Example 1.1 Profile-&#062;Prospect-&#062;unqualified, 1.2 Profile-&#062;Prospect-&#062;qualified, 1.3-&#062;Prospect-&#062;Customer....etc]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>02. Question:) Do you give sub-numbers to sub-categories?  Will Infusionsoft recognize a sub-category number(and would you use a period between numbers so they will pull it up in order). Example 1.1 Profile-&gt;Prospect-&gt;unqualified, 1.2 Profile-&gt;Prospect-&gt;qualified, 1.3-&gt;Prospect-&gt;Customer&#8230;.etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Judith Baker		</title>
		<link>https://www.blickdigital.com/5-rules-for-naming-your-infusionsoft-tags/#comment-200</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judith Baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blickdigital.com/?p=636#comment-200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmmm... now that I look at it would seems like you need to put the numbers first-- 01.Company A-&#062;Profile, 02.Company A-&#062;Campaign Status, 03.Company A-&#062; Historical..etc… and 10.Company B-&#062; Profile, 11.Company B-&#062;Campaign Status,  12.Company B-&#062;Historical etc...  Much easier to read with the numbers first!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; now that I look at it would seems like you need to put the numbers first&#8211; 01.Company A-&gt;Profile, 02.Company A-&gt;Campaign Status, 03.Company A-&gt; Historical..etc… and 10.Company B-&gt; Profile, 11.Company B-&gt;Campaign Status,  12.Company B-&gt;Historical etc&#8230;  Much easier to read with the numbers first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
